Martlet AI logoMartlet AI

Regulatory-grade risk adjustment.
Run inside your environment.

From chase list to submission-ready files: Martlet AI closes 95% of cases automatically at 99% precision, links every HCC to page-level evidence, and packages CMS-ready RADV audit packets. PHI never leaves your network.

  • 95%

    of cases closed automatically, end-to-end

  • 99%

    precision on every code the model automates

  • 95%

    reduction in chart review time

  • 100,000+

    lives served by our platform

  • 10

    health systems and payers in production

  • Zero

    PHI leaves your network — on-prem, VPC, or air-gapped

Martlet AI covers all three risk-adjustment workflows.

RADV, retrospective, and prospective — each covers a different part of the cycle, and you can run one or all three.

  • RADV

    audit readiness, year-round

    Regulatory-grade RADV

    Mock audits with RADV-style sampling and extrapolation exposure modeling. See which HCCs survive before CMS does — evidence packets in one click.

    View RADV
  • Retrospective

    high volume

    95% of cases closed automatically

    Prioritized chase lists, undercoded HCC capture, MEAT validation, and submission-ready deltas. Reviewers work exceptions, not stacks of PDFs.

    View Retrospective
  • Prospective

    point of care

    Suggestions clinicians act on

    Suspected conditions from structured and unstructured data, delivered pre-visit and in-visit as concise, evidence-linked suggestions in your EHR.

    View Prospective

RADV — verify every code the way CMS verifies it.

A detected encounter. A credentialed provider. A signed note. MEAT-supported documentation. Martlet AI runs the checks CMS applies at audit — automatically, on every chart — and links page-level evidence to every HCC. Codes that pass close on their own. Codes that don't get caught before CMS catches them.

progress_note_2025-03-14.pdf · page 4

Reviewed labs and medication adherence. A1c 8.1%. Type 2 diabetes with diabetic polyneuropathy — continue metformin, titrate gabapentin. Follow-up in 3 months. Discussed diet and foot care; monofilament exam performed.

ICD-10 E11.42 → HCC 37
Diabetes with chronic complications
v28
  • EncounterOffice visit · detected
  • Date of service03/14/2025
  • ProviderJ. Rivera, MD · credential verified
  • SignaturePresent · e-signed
  • MEATEvaluate · Treat
Closed automaticallyconfidence 0.97

All patient data shown is synthetically generated for illustration.

  • Encounter detection
  • Signature verification
  • Provider credential check
  • Page-level evidence links

Retrospective — from your data to your submission file.

Charts, claims and prior coding go in. Verified codes and submission-ready files come out, with no hand-offs to vendors or spreadsheets in between.

  1. Ingest

    Claims, EHR notes, scanned PDFs — normalized and de-duplicated.

  2. Prioritize

    Charts ranked by expected RAF impact and documentation strength.

  3. Validate

    Every code checked against the record, evidence linked to its page.

  4. Review

    Exceptions routed to your coders, with the evidence already attached.

  5. Submit

    Adds and deletes exported in the format your submission pipeline expects.

See the full retrospective workflow

Everything a risk-adjustment program runs on.

Every capability behind RADV, retrospective, and prospective — from ingestion to submission.

  • 01

    Chase list prioritization

    Chases ranked by expected RAF impact and documentation strength. Work the charts that matter first, and track every chase to closure.

  • 02

    CMS requirement verification

    Encounter detection, provider credential checks, and signature verification on every chart — the checks CMS coders run, run first.

  • 03

    MEAT validation

    Monitor, Evaluate, Assess, Treat — validated at the sentence level, with v24/v28 dual mapping and payment-year discipline.

  • 04

    Mock RADV sampling

    RADV-style sampling and extrapolation modeling against your own contracts. See your exposure before CMS measures it.

  • 05

    One-click evidence packets

    Chart sentence, encounter ID, date of service, provider, credentials, signature — assembled into a CMS-ready packet per HCC.

  • 06

    Submission-ready outputs

    Adds and deletes exported in the format your submission pipeline expects. Validated codes flow to submission; unsupported codes flow out.

  • 07

    Reviewer UI + exception queues

    The 5% that needs judgment lands in queues with linked evidence. QA sampling and dual review built in.

  • 08

    Complete audit trail

    Who coded what, when, and based on which evidence — every action recorded, ready to hand to an auditor.

  • 09

    RAF analytics

    RAF lift, capture rate, coder throughput, and cost per chart — measured continuously, reportable to the CFO.

  • 10

    EHR + claims ingestion

    FHIR R4, HL7, CCDs, claims extracts, and scanned PDFs with OCR. Millions of charts, normalized and de-duplicated.

  • 11

    Suspecting engine

    Suspected conditions surfaced from structured and unstructured data — labs, meds, notes — prioritized for pre-visit review.

  • 12

    Your deployment, your terms

    On-premises, private cloud (AWS, Azure, GCP), or air-gapped. Your existing security controls stay in effect, because nothing leaves them.

Built for in-house, end-to-end, audit-grade work.

  • Regulatory-grade accuracy

    Healthcare-specific AI, not a wrapper

    Martlet AI runs on John Snow Labs' production medical language models — ranked #1 on 12 of 13 medical benchmarks against frontier general-purpose LLMs. Every HCC links to MEAT evidence at the chart-sentence level, so every output is reproducible and defensible under RADV.

    See how accuracy holds up under audit
  • Run in-house

    Runs inside your environment, under your controls.

    Deploy on-premises, in your private cloud, or air-gapped. No external API in the data path, PHI that never leaves your network, and no services contract paid on success commission — you keep the coding, the knowledge, and the controls.

    How deployment works
  • Automation, not assistance

    95% closed automatically. Reviewers see the exceptions.

    Martlet AI runs at 99% precision on the codes it automates — high enough to close 95% of cases end-to-end and cut review time by 95%. Coders see only the cases that need judgment.

    See the workflow

In production at health systems, payers, and risk-bearing providers.

Featured case studies

Arkos Health runs Martlet AI across the full risk cycle: retrospective recapture, prospective capture at point of care, and mock RADV testing with automated evidence packets.

Incremental Revenue

Incremental Revenue

Meaningful incremental revenue from validated HCC recapture + in-year capture

HCC Coding Accuracy

HCC Coding Accuracy

Higher coding throughput by reducing manual chart hunting and the rework

Improved Audits

Improved Audits

Improved audit readiness through mock RADV testing & evidence packet automation

Partners

  • John Snow Labs
  • WVU Medicine
  • Arkos Health
  • Lunar Analytics
  • Pacific AI
  • D4H
  • Saince

Built for the review that happens three years later.

RADV auditors read every output long after submission. Martlet AI is engineered so each one holds up.

  • HIPAA-aligned, in-environment deployment

    On-premises, private cloud, or air-gapped. PHI never leaves your network, and your existing security controls stay in effect.

  • Governed AI, not a black box

    Every model versioned, every release tested before it touches production charts, every decision explainable — AI your compliance team can sign off on.

  • An answer for every auditor

    Every code, every change, every reviewer action — recorded. When CMS asks why a diagnosis was submitted, the answer is one click away.

  • Peer-reviewed accuracy

    30+ published papers behind the underlying medical language models. Benchmarks you can read, not adjectives.

How the engagement works.

  • An annual license

    You pay a license fee for the year. Not per chart, not per code we validate, and not a percentage of what you capture.

  • Priced to your size

    The fee is based on how many contracts and lives you run, and stays fixed for the year. Add contracts, volume or payment years without renegotiating.

  • Configured to your process

    We set the review levels, thresholds and exports to match how your team works, and connect to the systems they already use.

Questions buyers ask first.

What is regulatory-grade HCC coding?

Regulatory-grade HCC coding means every code is verified against the requirements CMS applies at audit: a valid, detected encounter; a credentialed provider; a present signature; and MEAT-supported documentation — with page-level evidence linked to each HCC. Martlet AI runs these checks automatically on every chart, so submissions are defensible under RADV three years later.

How does Martlet AI close 95% of retrospective cases automatically?

Martlet AI's healthcare-specific medical language models validate each HCC against MEAT criteria and CMS requirements with a calibrated confidence score, operating at 99% precision on the codes it automates. High-confidence cases — 95% of the total — close end-to-end; the rest route to reviewer queues with linked evidence. The result is a 95% reduction in chart review time.

Does PHI ever leave our network?

No. Martlet AI deploys on-premises, in your private cloud (AWS, Azure, or GCP), or fully air-gapped. There are no external AI API calls in the data path, and PHI never leaves your network — your existing security controls, SIEM, and IAM stay in effect.

What does Martlet AI hand off to our submission pipeline?

Adds and deletes, exported in the format your submission pipeline already expects, each carrying the date of service, the provider and the linked evidence behind the code. Unsupported codes identified during validation flow out as deletes, closing the loop on RADV exposure.

Does Martlet AI support the v28 transition?

Yes. Martlet AI maps every diagnosis under both CMS-HCC v24 and v28 with payment-year discipline: codes are validated against the model that applies to the payment year in question, and outdated codes are blocked at submission.

How do we prepare for a RADV audit?

Run mock RADV audits year-round: Martlet AI samples your contracts RADV-style, validates each sampled HCC against MEAT and CMS requirements, models your exposure, and assembles CMS-ready evidence packets — chart sentence, encounter, provider, credentials, and signature — in one click. When CMS selects your contract, the packet is already built.

Bring an anonymized chart. We'll show you what audit-grade looks like.

Bring an anonymized chart. We'll run Martlet AI on your data, walk the retrospective and RADV workflows end-to-end, and answer the security and deployment questions your team will ask.

  • 95%

    closed automatically

  • 99%

    precision on automated codes

  • 100,000+

    lives on the platform